Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 3, Issue : 4, Year : 2018
Article Page : 174-176
https://doi.org/10.18231/2581-4222.2018.0043
Abstract
Background: Current research was carried out to evaluate the severity score such as PSI, SMART-COP and CURB-65 for the capability to forecast the requirement for mechanical ventilation and inotropic support for adult patients.
Materials and Methods: Current observational research was carried out in subjects admit with CAP. The evaluation utensils utilized were the CURB-65 score, PSI, and the SMART-COP scores, particularly planned to forecast the necessity for intensive respiratory and vasopressor support. In general result with CAP was too evaluated.
Results: Statically significant was observed in sensitivity and specificity for CURB-65scoresinmechanical ventilation and inotropic support. Fifty nine participants have been mandatory required mechanical ventilation and 41 preferred inotropic supports during their hospital stay.
Conclusions: CURB 65 and PSI scores, even if extensively utilized for forecasting death in big inhabitants, they are not as much of precise for forecasting results.
Keywords: Community-acquired pneumonia; Cross-sectional study; Sensitivity; Specificity.
How to cite : Purohot C S, Patel K, Assessment of severity scores in community-acquired pneumonia for adult patients- A cross-sectional study. IP Indian J Immunol Respir Med 2018;3(4):174-176
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Viewed: 1604
PDF Downloaded: 609